Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration Research Articles

Effect of Hepatic and Renal Impairment on the Pharmacokinetics of Dersimelagon (MT-7117), an Oral Melanocortin-1 Receptor Agonist.

Dersimelagon is an orally administered selective melanocortin-1 receptor agonist being investigated for treatment of erythropoietic protoporphyria, X-linked protoporphyria, and diffuse cutaneous systemic sclerosis. Dersimelagon is extensively metabolized in the liver, and potential recipients may have liver dysfunction. Further, effects of renal impairment on pharmacokinetic properties should be established in drugs intended for chronic use. Two separate studies (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT04116476; NCT04656795) evaluated the effects of hepatic and renal impairment on dersimelagon pharmacokinetics, safety, and tolerability. Participants with mild (n=7) or moderate (n=8) hepatic impairment or normal hepatic function (n=8) received a single oral 100-mg dersimelagon dose. Participants with mild (n=8), moderate (n=8), or severe (n=8) renal impairment or normal renal function (n=8) received a single 300-mg dose. Systemic exposure to dersimelagon was comparable with mild hepatic impairment but higher with moderate hepatic impairment (maximum observed plasma concentration, 1.56-fold higher; area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time 0 extrapolated to infinity, 1.70-fold higher) compared with normal hepatic function. Maximum observed plasma concentration and area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time 0 extrapolated to infinity were similar with moderate renal impairment but higher with mild (1.86- and 1.87-fold higher, respectively) and severe (1.17- and 1.45-fold higher, respectively) renal impairment versus normal renal function. Dersimelagon was generally well tolerated.

Safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics of the novel RdRp inhibitor SHEN26 against SARS-CoV-2: a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind phase I study in healthy subjects

ABSTRACT Background SHEN26, an oral broad-spectrum antiviral drug, possesses potent preclinical activity against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) and has a favorable safety profile. Methods We report safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetic data from a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase I study of SHEN26. Eighty-six healthy subjects were enrolled in the three studies: a single ascending-dose study (SAD), a multiple ascending-dose study (MAD), and a food-effect study (FE). Results In the SAD trial, the maximum observed plasma concentration (Cmax) and area under the curve (AUC) of the SHEN26 rapid metabolite SHEN26-69-0 increased approximately dose-proportionally in the 50–400 mg fasting dose range. In the 800 mg dose group, standard meals increased the Cmax and AUC of SHEN26-69-0. In the MAD trial, the accumulation ratios of Cmax and AUC indicated slight accumulation upon repeated SHEN26 dosing. In the FE trial, a high-fat meal prolonged the time to maximum plasma concentration (Tmax) and increased the Cmax and AUC of SHEN26-69-0 compared with fasting administration. Most treatment-related adverse events were mild and resolved without treatment. Conclusion SHEN26 demonstrated satisfactory safety and tolerability in healthy subjects, which supports the continued study of SHEN26 against SARS-CoV-2. Trial Registration The trial is registered in ClinicalTrials.gov (CT. gov identifier: NCT05504746).

Comparative Pharmacokinetics and Safety Assessment of 1st- and 2nd-Generation Zinpentraxin Alfa Drug Products in Healthy Volunteers: A Randomized Crossover Study.

Zinpentraxin alfa is a recombinant form of the human pentraxin-2 that was studied in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF). To improve the purity and yield of the drug material, a 2nd-generation drug product was developed. To characterizeand compare the pharmacokinetic (PK) properties of the 1st- and 2nd-generation zinpentraxin alfa, PK studies were conducted in healthy volunteers (HVs). In a phase 1 randomized, double-blind, 2-sequence crossover, sequential 2-stage study (ISRCTN59409907), single intravenous (IV) doses of 1st- and 2nd-generation zinpentraxin alfa at 10mg/kg were studied with a blinded interim analysis (IA) at the end of stage 1. Bioequivalence (BE) was achieved for the maximum observed plasma concentration (Cmax), but the overall exposure was higher for the 2nd- compared to the 1st-generation zinpentraxin alfa. The study was stopped after stage 1 as the gating criteria were met based on the result of the blinded IA. Safety profiles were similar for the 1st- and 2nd-generation drug products, and antidrug antibody (ADA) was not observed in this study.

PHARMACOKINETICS AND EFFICACY OF A SINGLE TOPICAL DOSE OF EPRINOMECTIN IN GIRAFFE (GIRAFFA SPP.).

Growing resistance to current antiparasitic medications, both in livestock and in zoological species under human care, makes it imperative to evaluate available drugs on the market, such as eprinomectin. In this prospective study, five males and one female of reticulated (Giraffa reticulata; n = 2), Masai (Giraffa tippelskirchii; n = 1), Nubian (Giraffa camelopardalis; n = 2), and hybrid subspecies (n = 1) of giraffe, received 1.5 mg/kg eprinomectin topically along the dorsum. Using high-performance liquid chromatography, concentrations of eprinomectin in plasma samples collected at 0, 4, 24, and 48 h, and 7, 14, 21, and 28 d were evaluated following drug administration. Complete blood cell counts and biochemistry panels were performed before (n = 6) and after (n = 3) eprinomectin administration. Samples for modified double centrifugal fecal flotation (n = 6) were evaluated prior to eprinomectin administration to evaluate for endoparasites and were repeated after the study (n = 5). Noncompartmental pharmacokinetic analysis was applied to the data. The observed maximum plasma concentration was 11.45 ng/ml and the time of observed maximum concentration was 2.67 d. The mean terminal half-life was 5.16 d. No adverse effects were observed related to eprinomectin administration and no blood work changes were observed. Parasite loads decreased (n = 3) or did not change (n = 2) after eprinomectin administration. The mean peak plasma concentration of eprinomectin in giraffe was similar to that achieved in cattle, despite using three times the dose.

Pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics of ivosidenib in advanced IDH1-mutant cholangiocarcinoma: findings from the phase III ClarIDHy study

PurposeReport pharmacokinetic (PK)/pharmacodynamic (PD) findings from the phase III ClarIDHy study and any association between PK/PD parameters and treatment outcomes in this population.MethodsPatients with mutant isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 (mIDH1) advanced cholangiocarcinoma were randomized at a 2:1 ratio to receive ivosidenib or matched placebo. Crossover from placebo to ivosidenib was permitted at radiographic disease progression. Blood samples for PK/PD analyses, a secondary endpoint, were collected pre-dose and up to 4 h post-dose on day (D) 1 of cycles (C) 1 − 2, pre-dose and 2 h post-dose on D15 of C1 − 2, and pre-dose on D1 from C3 onwards. Plasma ivosidenib and D-2-hydroxyglutarate (2-HG) were measured using liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. All clinical responses were centrally reviewed previously.ResultsPK/PD analysis was available for samples from 156 ivosidenib-treated patients. Ivosidenib was absorbed rapidly following single and multiple oral doses (time of maximum observed plasma concentration [Tmax] of 2.63 and 2.07 h, respectively). Ivosidenib exposure was higher at C2D1 than after a single dose, with low accumulation. In ivosidenib-treated patients, mean plasma 2-HG concentration was reduced from 1108 ng/mL at baseline to 97.7 ng/mL at C2D1, close to levels previously observed in healthy individuals. An average 2-HG inhibition of 75.0% was observed at steady state. No plasma 2-HG decreases were seen with placebo. Plasma 2-HG reductions were observed in ivosidenib-treated patients irrespective of best overall response (progressive disease, or partial response and stable disease).ConclusionOnce-daily ivosidenib 500 mg has a favorable PK/PD profile, attesting the 2-HG reduction mechanism of action and, thus, positive outcomes in treated patients with advanced mIDH1 cholangiocarcinoma.Clinical trial registrationNCT02989857 Registered February 20, 2017.

First-in-human study of CPL207280, a novel G-protein-coupled receptor 40/free fatty acid receptor 1 agonist, in healthy volunteers after single and multiple administration.

To assess the safety, tolerability and pharmacokinetic (PK) profile of single and multiple doses of CPL207280, a new G-protein-coupled receptor 40 agonist developed to treat type 2 diabetes (T2D). The phase 1 study in healthy volunteers (White, age 18-55 years, body mass index 18.5-29.9 kg/m2 ) was performed after single (24 subjects, 5-480 mg) and multiple (32 subjects, 60-480 mg) once-daily administration of CPL207280. The effect of food intake and interaction with metformin were evaluated in additional cohort (12 subjects, 120 mg). The primary objective was the safety and tolerability of CPL207280. Secondary objectives included PK and pharmacodynamic (PD) characteristics (glucose, insulin, C-peptide, proinsulin, glucagon levels) observed during the 14-day treatment period. No deaths or serious adverse events (AEs) were reported. All reported AEs were classified as unrelated to the study product. No clinically significant differences in safety parameters were observed between cohorts and no food or metformin effect on safety parameters was identified. The ascending dose of CPL207280 caused an increase in the PK parameters maximum observed plasma concentration (Cmax ) or area under the plasma concentration-time curve up to 24 h. However, dose-normalized Cmax decreased with ascending dose. There was no relationship between the CPL207280 dose or prandial state and terminal elimination half-life and terminal elimination rate constant. No clear relationship between CPL207280 dose and PD area under the effect curve values was observed. CPL207280 was found to be safe and well tolerated by healthy volunteers (with a low risk of hepatotoxicity) for up to 14 days of administration. The PK profile of CPL207280 supports single-daily administration and justifies further development of this therapy for patients with T2D.

Phase I dose-escalation study to assess the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of an inhaled recombinant human ACE2.

APN01 is a soluble recombinant human angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (rhACE2), a key player in the renin-aldosterone-angiotensin system (RAAS). In clinical studies, APN01 was administered intravenously only, so far. The aim of this study (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT05065645) was to evaluate the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics (PK) and pharmacodynamics (PD) of inhaled APN01. This was a phase I, double-blind, placebo-controlled, dose-escalation study. Inhalation was conducted via a nebuliser over 15 min in three single ascending dose (SAD) cohorts (n=24) and two multiple ascending dose (MAD) cohorts (n=16: every 12 h for 7 days). Doses in the SAD cohort were 1.25, 2.5 and 5 mg·mL-1; doses in the MAD cohort were 2.5 and 5 mg·mL-1. Safety (including adverse events (AEs), laboratory findings and lung function results), PK and PD data were assessed. In the SAD and MAD cohorts, treatment-related AEs were slightly more frequent in the active treatment group than in the placebo group. AEs were mild to moderate, with no dose-limiting toxicities. No clinically relevant changes in lung function and laboratory results were observed. The mean maximum observed plasma concentration (Cmax) values after single and multiple doses of 5 mg·mL-1 APN01 were 1.88 and 6.61 ng·mL-1, respectively. Among the PD variables, significance was found for ACE2 and angiotensin 1-5. The application of aerosolised APN01 is safe and well tolerated after single and multiple doses. By achieving a high local concentration in the lungs and low systemic bioavailability, inhaled rhACE2 may present a therapeutic option in ACE2-related diseases.

Single-Dose Crossover Comparative Bioavailability Study of Two Different Posaconazole 100 mg Gastro-Resistant Tablets Under Fasted and Fed Conditions in Healthy Volunteers.

This study aimed to compare the bioavailability of two different gastro-resistant oral tablet formulations of posaconazole under fasted and fed conditions and to evaluate a potential food effect on the bioavailability of each formulation. Healthy volunteers randomly assigned to receive a test product (Posagil® 100 mg gastro-resistant tablet) or reference product (Noxafil® 100 mg gastro-resistant tablet) were included in this single-center, randomized, four-period (days 1, 15, 29 and 43), four-sequence crossover comparative bioavailability study. Data on posaconazole plasma concentrations and related pharmacokinetic profile (the maximum observed plasma concentration [Cmax] from time 0 to the time of last observed quantifiable plasma concentration [AUC0-T] and from time zero to infinity [AUC0-∞]) were recorded to evaluate efficacy of the test product in relation to the reference product under both fasted and fed conditions, based on bioequivalence (T-fasted vs. R-fasted and T-fed vs. R-fed) and food effect (T-fasted vs. T-fed and R-fasted vs. R-fed) assessments. Safety was evaluated through assessment of adverse events (AEs), standard laboratory evaluations, and vital signs. The bioequivalence criteria were met under fed conditions (T-fed vs. R-fed: geometric LSMean ratios of Cmax, AUC0-T, and AUC0-∞ of posaconazole were 97.41%, 97.45%, and 97.08%, respectively; all within the range of 80% to 125%) but not under fasted conditions. There was a food effect on the reference product (R-fed vs. R-fasted: geometric LSMean ratios of Cmax, AUC0-T, and AUC0-∞ of posaconazole were 145.32%, 138.84%, and 138.46%, respectively) but not on the test product. No safety concerns were identified. Our findings suggest that the pharmacokinetic profile of Posagil® is similar to the pharmacokinetic profile of Noxafil®. The generic Posagil® seems to have similarly high bioavailability under fed and fasted conditions, offering a higher posaconazole exposure than the original Noxafil® in the fasted state. Hence, Posagil® may be considered a value-added generic product that offers adequate posaconazole exposure under fasted state and fed state, regardless of the concomitant high-fat meal intake.

Pharmacokinetics of hydrorphone hydrochloride after intravenous and subcutaneous administration in ferrets (Mustela putorius furo)

ObjectiveTo determine the pharmacokinetic profile of hydromorphone 0.2 mg kg–1 administered by the intravenous (IV) and subcutaneous (SC) route in ferrets. Study designRandomized, crossover study. AnimalsA group of eight adult ferrets weighting (mean ± standard deviation) 1.02 ± 0.22 kg. MethodsHydromorphone hydrochloride 0.2 mg kg–1 was administered IV or SC with a washout period of 7 days. Blood samples were collected from a jugular catheter before administration of hydromorphone and at 5, 10, 15, 20, 30, 45, 60, 90, 120, 240, 360, 480 and 720 minutes after hydromorphone administration. Plasma hydromorphone concentrations were determined by liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectrometry. Data were analyzed using a non-linear mixed effects model. ResultsThe hydromorphone effective half-life was (t1/2) 45 min–1. Systemic clearance (Cls) and the volume of distribution (Vdss) following IV administration were 84.8 mL kg–1 min–1 and 5.59 L kg–1, respectively. The maximum observed plasma concentration was 59.53 ± 14.02 ng mL–1 within 10 minutes following SC administration. The SC bioavailability was 102.0%. Conclusions and clinical relevanceAdministration of IV and SC hydromorphone (0.2 mg kg–1) was characterized by a high clearance, short terminal half-life and large volume of distribution. Hydromorphone plasma concentrations remained greater than 2 ng mL–1 for 2 hours in most ferrets, a threshold reported to provide antinociceptive effects in other species. Hydromorphone was well absorbed following SC injection, providing an alternative administration route for clinical use in ferrets.

Prospective Pharmacokinetic Evaluation of Venetoclax (VEN) in AML Demonstrates Significant and Variable Drug Interactions with Azole Antifungals That Increase Ven Exposure, Reduce Clearance, and Necessitate Re-Evaluation of Dose Adjustments

Background: Venetoclax (VEN) in combination with hypomethylating agents (HMA) or low dose cytarabine (LDAC) is the standard of care for the treatment of newly diagnosed AML in pts aged ≥ 75 yrs. or unfit for intensive chemotherapy. While considered low-intensity, myelosuppression is universal, leading to increased rates of infection in the setting of neutropenia. Antifungal prophylaxis during induction has significantly lowered treatment-related mortality (TRM) attributed to invasive fungal infections (Cornely et al, 2007). Azole antifungals, the treatment of choice, pose significant drug-drug interactions through inhibition of CYP3A4 and p-glycoprotein (P-gp), both responsible for VEN metabolism and clearance. This interaction alters VEN pharmacokinetics (PK), increases its exposure, and therefore requires substantial dose adjustments (Agarwal et al, 2017). We previously showed that dose adjusted VEN plus HMA when used concomitantly with azoles retains efficacy, but still resulted in prolonged myelosuppression (Rausch et al, 2022). Little real-world PK data exists to confirm whether the recommended dose adjustments are appropriate or require further refinement. Methods: Pharmacokinetic analysis was conducted during the induction cycle of the phase II study of cladribine plus LDAC and VEN as previously described (Kadia et al, 2022). VEN was administered on days 1-21 during induction and was dose-adjusted to either 100 mg (later amended to 50 mg), 100 mg, or 400 mg daily when used with posaconazole (posa), voriconazole (vori), or caspofungin (caspo), respectively. Dose adjustments were based on package insert recommendations. Prior to amendment, VEN 100 mg was administered with posa based on previously published PK analysis suggesting a 75% dose reduction of VEN with concomitant posa (Agarwal et al, 2017). Steady state VEN PK analysis was conducted on day 8 and trough levels were collected on days 12 and 16 of cycle 1. Levels obtained with concomitant caspo served as a reference level, assuming no significant interaction between VEN and caspo. VEN levels were analyzed via an institutionally developed liquid chromatography coupled mass spectrometry (LCMS) assay and PK analysis was conducted via non-compartmental method using WinOnlin. Results: Forty patients, median age 68 (range, 61-78), were included for pharmacokinetic analysis. Average VEN AUC (area under the exposure) and Cmax (maximum observed plasma concentration) was higher with concomitant vori or posa than with caspo regardless of dose adjustments. Posa in combination with VEN 100 mg increased average AUC by 103% and Cmax by 63%. Vori with VEN 100 mg increased AUC and Cmax by 77% and 43%, respectively. Among the 3 groups, posa with VEN 50 mg resulted in a VEN AUC and Cmax most similar to that observed with caspo and VEN 400 mg. Concomitant posa delayed VEN clearance by 74% with VEN 50 mg and 79% with VEN 100 mg. As a result, the accumulation index observed with posa was 12.5 + 19.98 with VEN 100 mg, 9.2 + 17.5 with VEN 50 mg, and 3.7 + 1.92 with vori, compared to 1.7 + 0.5 with caspo. Although there was interpatient variability in VEN trough levels, we observed consistent intra-patient trough levels. In addition, significant correlation between VEN AUC and VEN trough levels (p = 1 x 10 -4, r 2 = 0.89) was observed. Conclusions: Despite dose adjustments, VEN AUC is significantly higher among pts receiving azole antifungals compared to those receiving caspo. Posa resulted in more potent inhibition of VEN clearance and greater accumulation compared to vori, despite both agents considered strong CYP3A4 inhibitors. This may be a result of the dual inhibitory effect of posa on both CYP3A4 and P-gp activity or more potent inhibition of CYP3A4. Based on PK evaluation, our data suggest VEN 50 mg with concomitant posa provides more similar drug exposure to VEN 400 mg and may be more appropriate than 70 mg or 100 mg in this setting. Given the high accumulation index observed with posa, PK analyses during cycle 2 are ongoing. While there is inter-patient variability in VEN PK, intra-patient trough levels are consistent, correlate well with VEN AUC, and could be used for therapeutic drug monitoring.

A First-in-Human Phase 1 Study of ABBV-525, a Small-Molecule MALT1 Inhibitor, in Patients with Relapsed or Refractory B-Cell Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma

Background and Significance Many B-cell malignancies are characterized by chronic activation of the B-cell receptor (BCR) and nuclear factor kappa B (NF-κB) signaling pathways. In many non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) subtypes, constitutive NF-κB activation results from genetic mutations and/or auto-antigen stimulation of the BCR pathway. While agents targeting the BCR pathway are effective treatments for many B-cell malignancies, patients (pts) often have progressive disease due to acquired resistance to BCR-targeted agents. Thus, there is an unmet medical need for novel therapeutic targets and treatment approaches. The mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue lymphoma translocation protein 1 (MALT1) is an enzymatic and scaffolding node in the BCR pathway and a key mediator of the BCR/NF-κB signal transduction pathway. Its action is downstream, or in some instances parallel to, resistance mechanisms to existing NHL therapies, including BTK C481S and PLCG2 mutations, which are known acquired mechanisms of resistance to covalent Bruton's tyrosine kinase (BTK) inhibitors in pts with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). MALT1 inhibition represents a novel therapeutic approach for malignancies with chronic activation of NF-κB, including those pts with acquired resistance to upstream targets. ABBV-MALT1 is a small-molecule, tool compound, MALT1 inhibitor. Preclinical studies of ABBV-MALT1 have demonstrated potent activity against MALT1-relevant biomarkers, including inhibition of BCR pathway signal transduction and reduced NF-κB gene activation in non-germinal center B-cell diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (non-GCB DLBCL) cell lines. ABBV-MALT1 has also shown activity in a range of preclinical lymphoma models as both monotherapy and in combination with venetoclax, including robust antitumor activity in malignant B-cell models that are resistant to BTK inhibitors. This phase 1 study evaluates the clinical candidate MALT1 inhibitor ABBV-525 as monotherapy in pts with relapsed or refractory (R/R) B-cell NHL. Study Design and Methods This is a first-in-human, phase 1, open-label, multicenter study of single-agent ABBV-525 in pts with R/R B-cell NHL (NCT05618028). Eligibility criteria are listed in Table 1. The primary objectives are to evaluate safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics (PK) of ABBV-525 and to determine the recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D). The secondary objective is to assess the preliminary efficacy of ABBV-525 in subsets of pts with R/R B-cell NHL. Exploratory objectives include evaluating biomarkers predictive of response and pharmacodynamic biomarkers, including the effects of ABBV-525 on BCR pathway signal transduction and NF-κB gene activation. This is a 3-part study (Figure 1): dose escalation (part 1), dose optimization (part 2), and dose expansion (part 3). Part 1 aims to establish the maximum administered dose/maximum tolerated dose of ABBV-525 and is primarily guided by a Bayesian optimal interval design. Part 2 aims to identify the RP2D of ABBV-525. Part 3 will further characterize the safety profile of ABBV-525 at the RP2D. Approximately 150 pts are planned for enrollment, including those with various R/R mature B-cell lymphomas in part 1, pts with documented diagnosis of R/R CLL in part 2, and pts with documented diagnosis of non-GCB DLBCL in part 3. ABBV-525 is orally administered until disease progression, intolerable toxicity, or other study discontinuation criteria are met. Safety assessments include dose-limiting toxicities, adverse events (per National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v5.0), clinical laboratory parameters, vital signs, and electrocardiogram variables. PK parameters, including maximum observed plasma concentration (C max), time to C max, and area under the concentration-time curve will be analyzed using noncompartmental methods. Efficacy will be assessed through response per disease-specific criteria (including International Workshop on Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia, International Workshop on Waldenstrom's Macroglobulinemia, and Lugano classification). Duration of response will be evaluated by Kaplan-Meier estimates. Biomarker data will be analyzed as change from baseline and summarized for each scheduled postbaseline visit. Pts are being enrolled in 25 sites across the USA, Australia, Belgium, France, Germany, Israel, Spain, and UK. As of August 1, 2023, 2 pts had been treated.

A Phase I, Open-Label, Fixed Sequence Study to Investigate the Effect of Cytochrome P450 2D6 Inhibition on the Pharmacokinetics of Ulotaront in Healthy Subjects.

Ulotaront is a novel psychotropic agent with agonist activity at trace amine-associated receptor 1 (TAAR1) and 5-hydroxytryptamine type 1A (5-HT1A) receptors in phase III clinical development for the treatment of schizophrenia. This study aimed to investigate the effect of paroxetine, a strong cytochrome P450 (CYP) 2D6 inhibitor, on ulotaront pharmacokinetics (PK) in healthy volunteers. Subjects received a single oral dose of 25 mg ulotaront on Day 1 and an oral dose of 20 mg paroxetine once daily from Days 5 to 10 to achieve steady-state plasma paroxetine levels. On Day 11, subjects received another single oral dose of 25 mg ulotaront, with continued daily oral dosing of 20 mg paroxetine from Days 11 to 14. All 24 subjects were CYP2D6 normal metabolizers. Coadministration of paroxetine increased ulotaront maximum observed plasma concentration (Cmax) and area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time zero to infinity (AUC∞) by 31% and 72%, respectively, and decreased ulotaront apparent clearance (CL/F) by approximately 42%. While coadministration of paroxetine increased AUC∞ of active but minor metabolite SEP-363854 by 32%, it had no effect on SEP-363854 Cmax, or on SEP-363854 to the ulotaront AUC from time zero to the last quantifiable concentration (AUClast) ratio. Based on the acceptable adverse event profile of ulotaront across previous phase II studies, the increase in ulotaront exposure is unlikely to be clinically meaningful. Weak drug-drug interactions were observed between ulotaront and the strong CYP2D6 inhibitor paroxetine; however, dose adjustment as a precondition when ulotaront is coadministered with strong CYP2D6 inhibitors or administered to CYP2D6 poor metabolizers should not be necessary.

Pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics and safety profile of the dual orexin receptor antagonist vornorexant/TS-142 in healthy Japanese participants following single/multiple dosing: Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase-1 studies.

The pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics and safety profile of vornorexant were investigated in healthy Japanese participants in three double-blind studies: a single ascending dose of 1-30 mg (Study 101; n = 6) and multiple ascending doses of 10-30 mg (Study 102; n = 6). Study 202 consisted of two steps: an open-label, 20 mg repeated-dose in non-elderly individuals (Step 1; n = 12) and a double-blind, 20 mg repeated-dose in elderly individuals (Step 2; n = 8/3 for vornorexant/placebo). Vornorexant was rapidly absorbed and eliminated under fasting conditions, with a time to maximum plasma concentration of 0.500-3.00 h (range) and elimination half-life of 1.32-3.25 h. The area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) of vornorexant increased proportionally with dose increments. Sleepiness-related pharmacodynamic outcome changes (Karolinska sleepiness scale, digit symbol substitution test and psychomotor vigilance task) were generally increased with dose increments at 1 and 4 h post-dose, whereas no consistent dose-related changes were detected the next morning. Food intake did not affect the maximum observed plasma concentration of vornorexant but increased the AUC0-inf . Exposure in elderly individuals was generally comparable to that in non-elderly individuals. Altogether, vornorexant may have a favourable profile for insomnia treatment, including rapid onset of action and minimal next-day residual effects.

Relative bioavailability of budesonide/glycopyrrolate/formoterol fumarate triple therapy delivered using next generation propellants with low global warming potential

IntroductionThe climate crisis poses an immediate threat to human health and well-being, demanding urgent adaptions across sectors, including healthcare. The development of pressurized metered dose inhalers (MDIs) with greater sensitivity to the climate emergency using novel propellants with lower global warming potentials (GWPs), but comparable pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters to currently marketed MDIs, is a vital step toward reducing the impact of healthcare for respiratory disorders on climate change. This study evaluated the relative bioavailabilities of the individual components of a fixed-dose combination of budesonide/glycopyrrolate/formoterol fumarate (BGF) 160/9/4.8 μg per actuation between three different propellant formulations. MethodsHealthy male participants (aged 18–60 years) were randomized into a single-blind, three-period, single-dose, single-center, crossover study (NCT04600505). The PK and safety and tolerability profiles of BGF MDI formulated with two novel propellants with low GWP (hydrofluoroolefin-1234ze [HFO]; hydrofluorocarbon-152a [HFC]) were compared with BGF MDI formulated with the propellant used in the currently marketed reference product (hydrofluoroalkane-134a [HFA]). The study included a screening period, three treatment periods (with 3- to 7-day washout periods between each dose), and a follow-up. The primary PK parameters assessed were maximum observed plasma concentration (Cmax), area under the plasma concentration curve (AUC) from time zero extrapolated to infinity (AUCinf), and AUC from time zero to the time of the last quantifiable analyte concentration (AUClast). The study was not powered to statistically demonstrate bioequivalence. ResultsForty-seven participants completed the study, and 24 participants were evaluable for PK assessments. Systemic exposure, based on geometric mean ratios (90% confidence interval), to each BGF component from the test propellants delivered in a standard MDI was comparable with the reference propellant for AUClast (HFO vs. HFA: budesonide, 107.30 [94.53, 121.90]; glycopyrrolate, 106.10 [86.18, 130.60]; formoterol, 98.13 [86.44, 111.40]; HFC vs. HFA: budesonide, 98.80 [84.59, 115.40]; glycopyrrolate, 99.71 [80.84, 123.00]; formoterol, 107.00 [88.82, 128.90]); AUCinf (where evaluable) and Cmax followed the same trend. There were no serious adverse events or adverse events leading to treatment discontinuation. No new safety signals were observed. ConclusionsSystemic BGF component exposure was similar for both test propellants (HFO and HFC) compared with the HFA reference propellant, with an acceptable safety profile in the studied population. Therefore, both novel low GWP propellants show strong potential as candidates for development of MDIs with greater sensitivity to the climate crisis, a vital step toward ameliorating the detrimental impact of healthcare on the environment. Further investigation in larger studies is warranted.

Pharmacokinetics, Safety, and Tolerability of Vonoprazan- or Esomeprazole-Based Bismuth-Containing Quadruple Therapy: A Phase 1, Double-Blind, Parallel-Group Study in Adults with Helicobacter pylori Infection in China.

Quadruple therapy comprising 2 antibiotics, a proton pump inhibitor, and bismuth, is recommended for Helicobacter pylori eradication in China. This Phase 1, double-blind, parallel-group study aimed to evaluate the pharmacokinetics, safety, and tolerability of bismuth-containing vonoprazan- or esomeprazole-based quadruple therapy in H. pylori-positive healthy subjects at a single site in China. Quadruple therapy comprising vonoprazan 20mg or esomeprazole 20mg with bismuth potassium citrate 600mg (equivalent to bismuth 220mg), clarithromycin 500mg, and amoxicillin 1000mg was administered twice daily for 2weeks. Forty-four subjects were enrolled, 22 each in the vonoprazan (mean age, 34.5years; men, 63.6%) and esomeprazole (mean age, 31.6years; men, 59.1%) groups. Day 14 bismuth plasma pharmacokinetic parameters area under the plasma concentration-time curve during a dosing interval (geometric mean ratio, 1.07 [90% confidence interval, 0.82-1.40]) and maximum observed plasma concentration (geometric mean ratio, 1.30 [90% confidence interval, 0.94-1.81]) were similar between the treatment groups. At Day 42 follow-up, 100% and 94.4% of subjects were H. pylori negative in the vonoprazan and esomeprazole groups, respectively. The incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events was similar between the groups, with no serious adverse events. No new safety concerns were identified. In conclusion, vonoprazan had no significant effect on plasma bismuth exposure compared with esomeprazole.

TABLET: Relative bioavailability and bioequivalence study of niraparib tablets and capsules in patients with advanced solid tumors.

e17603 Background: Niraparib is a poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitor, approved as a maintenance treatment (tx) for patients (pts) with advanced ovarian cancer and under investigation in solid tumors, available in 100 mg capsules (starting dose: 200 or 300 mg/day). Compared with capsules, tablets have improved stability in hot and humid conditions. This study assessed the relative bioavailability (BA; Stage 1 [S1]) and bioequivalence (BE; Stage 2 [S2]) between niraparib tablets and capsules. Methods: This was a US, open-label, multicenter, single-cohort, randomized-sequence study with an optional extension phase. Eligible pts were ≥18 years, had histologically/cytologically confirmed advanced solid tumors (metastatic or local), disease progression despite standard therapy (if available), and ECOG performance scores of 0–2. Pts were dosed 1x300 mg tablet or 3x100 mg capsules then crossed over to the other tx after full washout. Pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters were assessed up to 168 hours post-niraparib dose; safety was assessed throughout and for 30 days after last dose (90 days for serious adverse events). A comparison of the log-transformed PK parameters (maximum observed plasma concentration [Cmax], area under the plasma concentration–time curve from time 0 to time of the last quantifiable concentration [AUC0–t] and from time 0 extrapolated to infinity [AUC0–∞]) was carried out to evaluate the formulations using a linear mixed-effects model with fixed effects for sequence, period, and tx and random effect for pt nested within sequence. Results: Pts in both stages completed study drug and washout/PK periods and had sufficient PK samples to estimate PK parameters in both periods. In S1 (n=29), a comparable BA performance of both formulations was demonstrated; the 90% confidence intervals (CI) of the geometric least square means (LSM) for Cmax, AUC0–t, and AUC0–∞ for tablet/capsule were within prespecified 0.80–1.25 limits (intra-pt variability: 12.4–21.9%). An initial 7-day washout period between PK assessments was extended to 14 days in S2 due to significant carryover reported in 6 pts in S1. In S2 (n=108), niraparib PK characteristics were similar following dosing with tablet or capsule (Table); LSM ratios of the key parameters were close to unity and 90% CI for the ratio of Cmax, AUC0–t, and AUC0–∞ were within prespecified 0.80–1.25 limits required to demonstrate BE. No new safety signals were reported. Conclusions: Both niraparib formulations were bioequivalent and can be used interchangeably. Editorial support was provided by Fishawack Health, funded by GSK. Clinical trial information: NCT03329001 . [Table: see text]

Lorpucitinib (JNJ-64251330) in patients with familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP): Results from a phase 1b study.

10514 Background: FAP is the most common hereditary adenomatous polyposis syndrome and, if left untreated, will lead to colorectal cancer development in nearly all patients. Chronic inflammation, driven in part by the Janus kinase (JAK)/signal transducer and activator of transcription (STAT) pathway, may promote polyp formation. Enteric-selective inhibition of the JAK/STAT pathway may provide a treatment for FAP. Lorpucitinib is an oral, small molecule, potent pan-JAK inhibitor with favorable enteric-selective properties. Here, we report the efficacy, safety, and pharmacokinetic (PK) results from a phase 1b study of lorpucitinib in patients with FAP (NCT05014360). Methods: Patients aged ≥18 years with ≥6 polyps ≥2 mm in diameter in the rectum or colon with FAP ( APC germline mutation or obligate carrier) received lorpucitinib 75 mg twice daily for 24 weeks. The primary objective was to evaluate the effect of lorpucitinib on colorectal polyp burden at Week 24, assessed by endoscopy at baseline and Week 24. Secondary objectives were safety, PK, and biomarker assessments of lorpucitinib activity. Results: Overall, 42 (23 pre-colectomy; 19 post-colectomy) patients with FAP were enrolled, with a median age of 33 (range, 19-61) years. No clear effect on polyp burden was observed at Week 24. Gut mucosal and polyp concentrations of lorpucitinib were much higher than plasma concentrations, indicating an enteric-selective distribution. Mean sigmoid colon, rectum, and polyp concentrations of lorpucitinib at Week 8 were 112-, 473-, and 108-fold higher, respectively, than the observed maximum plasma concentration at Week 8 (1 hour). At Week 8, lorpucitinib achieved JAK tyrosine kinase inhibition in mucosal biopsies as evidenced by a median 37% reduction in normalized pSTAT-3 levels. Lorpucitinib reduced serum-based inflammatory biomarkers such as C-reactive protein and serum amyloid A by Week 16 of therapy. Some patients reported an improvement of clinical symptoms such as less frequent bowel movements and less blood in the stool. The most common adverse events (AEs) were abdominal pain (16%), bilirubin increased (13%), headache (13%), lipase increased (13%), and diarrhea (13%). There were no treatment-related serious AEs, grade 3 treatment-emergent AEs, serious infections, or venous thromboembolisms. Conclusions: These results show that lorpucitinib had no clear effect on polyp burden. The study found that lorpucitinib is safe and exhibits an enteric-selective distribution in FAP patients. Inhibition of JAK tyrosine kinase signaling was associated with reduced STAT-3 phosphorylation in mucosal biopsies from FAP patients. While reductions observed in polyp burden were not clinically significant, lorpucitinib treatment lowered levels of several serum inflammatory biomarkers. Treatment with lorpucitinib was safe and well tolerated, and may improve clinical symptoms associated with FAP. Clinical trial information: NCT05014360 .

Pharmacokinetics and Safety of Cotadutide, a GLP-1 and Glucagon Receptor Dual Agonist, in Individuals with Renal Impairment: A Single-Dose, Phase I, Bridging Study.

Cotadutide is a balanced glucagon-like peptide-1 and glucagon receptor dual agonist under development for the treatment of non-alcoholic steatohepatitis and type 2 diabetes with chronic kidney disease. We evaluated the pharmacokinetics (PK), safety and immunogenicity of a single dose of cotadutide in individuals with varying degrees of renal impairment. In this phase I bridging study, individuals 18-85 years of age, with a body mass index of 17-40 kg/m2 and varying degrees of renal function {end-stage renal disease (ESRD; creatinine clearance [CrCl] < 20mL/min); severe renal impairment (CrCl ≥ 20 to < 30 mL/min); lower moderate renal impairment (CrCl ≥ 30 to < 44 mL/min); upper moderate renal impairment (CrCl ≥ 45 to < 60 mL/min); normal renal function (CrCl ≥ 90 mL/min)} were treated with a single dose of subcutaneous cotadutide 100 µg under fasted conditions in the lower abdomen. The co-primary endpoints were area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time zero to 48h (AUC48) and the maximum observed plasma concentration (Cmax) for cotadutide. Safety and immunogenicity were secondary endpoints. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03235375). A total of 37 individuals were enrolled in the study (only three enrolled in the ESRD group, therefore this group was excluded from the primary PK analysis). AUC48 and Cmax values for cotadutide were similar across all renal function groups {severe renal impairment vs. normal renal function: AUC48 geometric mean ratio (GMR) 0.99 (90% confidence interval [CI] 0.76-1.29); lower moderate renal impairment versus normal renal function: AUC48 GMR 1.01 (90% CI 0.79-1.30); upper moderate renal impairment versus normal renal function: AUC48 GMR 1.09 (90% CI 0.82-1.43)}. A sensitivity analysis that combined the ESRD and severe renal impairment groups did not show notable changes in the AUC48 and Cmax GMRs. The incidences of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAE) ranged from 42.9 to 72.7% across all groups and were mostly mild to moderate in severity. Only one patient had a grade III or worse TEAE during the study period. No positive antidrug antibody results were observed. These results suggest that the PK and tolerability of cotadutide are unaffected by renal function and that dose adjustments may not be required in individuals with renal impairment.

Comparison of Two Manufacturing Processes of Daprodustat for Bioequivalence and Dissolution in Healthy Volunteers: A Randomized Crossover Study.

Daprodustat, an orally bioavailable hypoxia-inducible factor-prolyl hydroxylase enzyme inhibitor, has recently completed phase 3 clinical development for treating anemia of chronic kidney disease. Part A of this 2-part, randomized, double-blind, single-dose, cross-over study (NCT04640311) compared pharmacokinetic properties of a single oral dose of daprodustat 4 mg tablets manufactured via twin-screw wet granulation (process 1) to 2 sets of 4 mg tablets manufactured via high-shear wet granulation (process 2), to assess the impact of different dissolution profiles on pharmacokinetics. Part B assessed the bioequivalence of daprodustat tablets manufactured via process 1 with tablets manufactured via process 2 at 5 different dose strengths (1, 2, 4, 6, and 8mg). In part A, mean plasma concentrations of daprodustat were comparable over a 24-hour period despite differences in manufacturing processes and dissolution profiles. In part B, the 90% confidence intervals of the ratios of the least squared means for area under the concentration-time curve and maximum observed plasma concentration fell within the 0.8-1.25 bioequivalence range for all doses, except for maximum observed plasma concentration at 8mg. A prespecified sensitivity analysis jointly assessing all doses showed bioequivalence for all doses tested. No new safety concerns for daprodustat were identified.

Rimegepant 75mg in Subjects With Hepatic Impairment: Results of a Phase 1, Open-Label, Single-Dose, Parallel-Group Study.

Rimegepant is a small-molecule calcitonin gene-related peptide receptor antagonist (gepant) with demonstrated efficacy and safety in the acute and preventive treatment of migraine. Here, we report the pharmacokinetics and safety of a single 75-mg oral dose of rimegepant in subjects with severe, moderate, or mild hepatic impairment and matched healthy subjects from an open-label, single-dose, 4-group phase 1 study. Thirty-six subjects aged 41-71 years were enrolled, including 6 each with severe, moderate, or mild hepatic impairment and 18 healthy subjects. All subjects completed the study. A <20% increase in total and unbound pharmacokinetics was observed in subjects with mild hepatic impairment and ≤65% increase with moderate hepatic impairment versus matched healthy controls. Total and unbound systemic exposure increased 2.0- and 3.9-fold in the severe hepatic impairment group. In subjects with severe hepatic impairment, geometric mean ratios (severe impairment/controls) for total concentrations were 202.2% for area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time 0 to the last quantifiable concentration, 202.2% for area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time 0 to infinity, and 189.1% for maximum observed plasma concentration. Corresponding geometric mean ratios using unbound concentrations were 388.8% and 388.7%, respectively. Three (8.3%) subjects reported 4 treatment-emergent adverse events. Rimegepant is not recommended for use in adults with severe hepatic impairment.